{"id":19195,"date":"2014-09-11T20:49:19","date_gmt":"2014-09-11T20:49:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/uacrisis.org\/?p=9283"},"modified":"2014-09-12T12:00:30","modified_gmt":"2014-09-12T10:00:30","slug":"9283-reply-john-mearsheimer-putin-realist","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/uacrisis.org\/en\/9283-reply-john-mearsheimer-putin-realist","title":{"rendered":"A Reply to John Mearsheimer: Putin is Not a Realist"},"content":{"rendered":"

Since the beginning of crisis in Ukraine, a handful of high-profile American academics and former policy-makers — including University of Chicago Professor John Mearsheimer and former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger — have rushed to the defense of Putin\u2019s actions based on a theory of international relations called realism. According to this theory, countries are part of an international system that is \u201canarchy.\u201d This doesn\u2019t mean that the world is inherently volatile or violent, but rather that there is not a central authority to regulate or punish the actions of individual countries. In this environment, countries are not bound by a set of rules that govern their behavior; instead, countries behave rationally to maximize their interests in the international system by warding off potential threats or taking actions to protect core interests.<\/span><\/p>\n

According to some realists\u2019 line of argument, Putin\u2019s actions are a natural reaction to both NATO expansionism and Western interference in Ukraine. As a powerful state, Russia is particularly sensitive to foreign threats on its border, and is willing to take significant risks to defend its core interests. They believe that NATO expansion has put Russia on the defensive, making Russia hypersensitive about new potential threats on its borders. When Euromaidan toppled former Ukraine President Viktor Yanukovych and replaced him with a pro-Western interim government, the perceived threat of further NATO expansion compelled Putin to act.<\/p>\n

In his article \u2018Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West\u2019s Fault\u2019, which appeared in Foreign Affairs<\/i>, Mearsheimer argues:<\/p>\n

\u201cRussian leaders have adamantly opposed NATO enlargement, and in recent years, they have made it clear that they would not stand by while their strategically important neighbor turned into a Western bastion. For Putin, the illegal overthrow of Ukraine\u2019s democratically elected and pro-Russian president — which he rightly labeled a \u2018coup\u2019 — was the final straw.\u201d<\/p>\n

In this view, Putin is a realist, hyper-aware of foreign threats. But Mearsheimer, and the so-called realist consensus on Ukraine hardly seems correct. This approach to the Ukraine conflict makes unsupported assumptions about the nature of Russian interests, the West\u2019s support for Ukraine, and Russia\u2019s reasons for intervention.<\/p>\n

Following the Euromaidan revolution, Ukraine\u2019s prospects of joining the alliance remained unlikely. Although former Ukrainian presidents Kuchma and Yushchenko had previously expressed Ukraine\u2019s intention to join the alliance, NATO never seriously considered adding Ukraine. Additionally, NATO status for Ukraine did not seem like a popular proposition for the majority of Ukraine\u2019s population, even after Maidan. In April 2014, the Ukrainian polling agency Razumkov Center found that more than 41 percent of Ukrainians were still opposed to NATO membership, while only 36 percent supported membership. Russia\u2019s moves against Ukraine will only continue to push Ukraine, and young people in particular, toward the West. The Ukrainian Twitter campaign, #NATOforUkraine, went viral last week during the NATO summit in Wales, and increasingly vocal members of Ukrainian society will continue to push for NATO membership as long as Russian aggression continues unabated.<\/p>\n

Russia\u2019s position as Ukraine\u2019s single greatest security threat is now well-established. Further, Russia\u2019s aggression has resulted in the mobilization of NATO troops to Russia\u2019s border, altered NATO\u2019s defensive posture, and reinvigorated the alliance at a time when NATO\u2019s future was very much in doubt. If Putin was trying to undermine NATO and prevent its expansion, he\u2019s instead triggered the very opposite effect.<\/p>\n

The realists also overstate the West\u2019s commitment to Ukraine. Rather than vigorously oppose Russia in the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, most western countries view Ukraine as an unwanted distraction to other issues. After Crimea\u2019s annexation, the EU and United States imposed only minor sanctions, a ludicrously inadequate response. The West has slowly come around to imposing stiffer sanctions on the Russian Federation, and only after hundreds of Europeans were blown out of the sky by Russian proxies. Western countries have failed to provide the Ukrainian military with weapons, or offer much more than words of support.<\/p>\n

Mearsheimer and other realists have misjudged Putin, his goals and motivations. Far from being a \u201crealist\u201d policy maker, Vladimir Putin is a myopic autocrat. Instead of enhancing Russian security, Putin\u2019s illegal annexation of Crimea and intervention in eastern Ukraine has put Russia\u2019s long-term status as a unified state in jeopardy. Not only have his actions mobilized NATO and injected new vigor into the alliance, but they have called into question Russia\u2019s future control of minority regions of Russia. By cynically advocating for Crimeans\u2019 \u201cright to self-determination\u201d and supporting militants in eastern Ukraine, Putin has opened a can of worms that he has long tried to keep sealed. With an 85 percent approval rating and an iron grip over Russia\u2019s informational sphere, Putin can be reasonably confident in his ability to \u00a0crush Islamism, separatism and other forms of dissent in the short-term. But if the Russian economy continues to flag, or a cataclysmic event releases pent up frustrations against Putin and his cronies, Putin\u2019s misadventures in Ukraine raise the risks of the Russian Federation fracturing along ethnic or regional lines.<\/p>\n

Putin\u2019s actions in Ukraine are best described as \u201cpro-Putin,\u201d not pro-Russian. Putin\u2019s annexation of Crimea, and policy of continued instability in eastern Ukraine are designed to bolster his popularity and the strength of his regime, not Russia\u2019s actual security interests. Euromaidan, as an expression of dissatisfaction against corruption and authoritarianism, represented a real threat to the Russian government. If the Ukrainian people could overthrow President Viktor Yanukovych, this raised the spectacle of the Russian people rising up against Putin. Such an affront demanded a disproportionate response and a billion-dollar propaganda campaign to discredit the Ukrainian revolution as fascist.<\/p>\n

The annexation of Crimea has been an incredible success for Putin\u2019s regime even as it undermines Russia. Putin\u2019s soaring popularity ratings have given the Russian government the capability to continue to crush the remnants of Russian civil society and dissent. Putin has taken advantage of newfound leverage to pass a slate of laws suppressing Internet freedom in Russia, the last relatively free platform for Russian civil society. Putin continues to stoke the flames of ultranationalism by appropriating hardline rhetoric from Russian fringe figures like neo-fascist thinker Alexander Dugin and hardline politician Vladimir Zhirinovsky. Putin has increasingly spoken about the resurrection of something called Novorossiya, using a dubious historical narrative to lay claim to a broad swath of Ukrainian territory in the south and east of the country.<\/p>\n

Putin\u2019s attitude has limited Russia\u2019s ability to disengage from Ukraine after having stirred powerful nationalist tendencies that are difficult to control. Putin\u2019s Russia is unable to disengage from a situation that is increasingly isolating Russia politically, culturally and economically. By unleashing the forces of hyper-nationalism and separatism in Russia, Putin has engendered a combustible mix of political tensions that undermines Russia\u2019s strategic flexibility and might eventually threaten the country\u2019s territorial integrity.<\/p>\n

Realists such as John Mearsheimer should take note that the interests of Putin and his cronies are not the interests of Russia. Putin\u2019s actions in Ukraine have endangered the very interests that Mearsheimer claims Russia is defending. Russian intervention in Ukraine has resulted in a re-invigorated NATO on Russia\u2019s borders, driven Ukraine closer into the arms of the West\u2019s political and security system, and threatened to undermine Russia\u2019s own territorial integrity. In the case of Putin\u2019s Ukrainian intervention, Mearsheimer and other realists both misjudge the West\u2019s role in the conflict and incorrectly define Russia\u2019s long-term interests as that of Putin\u2019s interests. The Crimea annexation and ongoing intervention in eastern Ukraine has little to do with NATO or the West, but has everything to do with retaining a kleptocratic system.<\/p>\n

<\/i>Chris Dunnett, Ukraine Crisis Media Center<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Since the beginning of crisis in Ukraine, a handful of high-profile American academics and former policy-makers — including University of Chicago Professor John Mearsheimer and former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger — have rushed to the defense of Putin\u2019s actions based on a theory of international relations called realism. According to this theory, countries […] More<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":20,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[705,748],"tags":[],"section":[743],"form":[800],"yoast_head":"\nA Reply to John Mearsheimer: Putin is Not a Realist | UACRISIS.ORG<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Since the beginning of crisis in Ukraine, a handful of high-profile American academics and former policy-makers -- including University of Chicago | Uacrisis.org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/uacrisis.org\/en\/9283-reply-john-mearsheimer-putin-realist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"A Reply to John Mearsheimer: Putin is Not a Realist | UACRISIS.ORG\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Since the beginning of crisis in Ukraine, a handful of high-profile American academics and former policy-makers -- including University of Chicago | Uacrisis.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/uacrisis.org\/en\/9283-reply-john-mearsheimer-putin-realist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Uacrisis.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/uacrisis\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2014-09-11T20:49:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-09-12T10:00:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@uacrisis\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@uacrisis\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"\u0417\u0430\u0445\u0430\u0440 \u0411\u0443\u0442\u043a\u043e\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"A Reply to John Mearsheimer: Putin is Not a Realist | UACRISIS.ORG","description":"Since the beginning of crisis in Ukraine, a handful of high-profile American academics and former policy-makers -- including University of Chicago | Uacrisis.org","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/uacrisis.org\/en\/9283-reply-john-mearsheimer-putin-realist","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"A Reply to John Mearsheimer: Putin is Not a Realist | UACRISIS.ORG","og_description":"Since the beginning of crisis in Ukraine, a handful of high-profile American academics and former policy-makers -- including University of Chicago | Uacrisis.org","og_url":"https:\/\/uacrisis.org\/en\/9283-reply-john-mearsheimer-putin-realist","og_site_name":"Uacrisis.org","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/uacrisis\/","article_published_time":"2014-09-11T20:49:19+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-09-12T10:00:30+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@uacrisis","twitter_site":"@uacrisis","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"\u0417\u0430\u0445\u0430\u0440 \u0411\u0443\u0442\u043a\u043e","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/uacrisis.org\/uk\/#organization","name":"Ukraine crisis media center","url":"https:\/\/uacrisis.org\/uk\/","sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/uacrisis\/","http:\/\/youtube.com\/UACrisisMediaCenter","https:\/\/twitter.com\/uacrisis"],"logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/uacrisis.org\/uk\/#logo","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/uacrisis.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/header_logo-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/uacrisis.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/header_logo-1.png","width":250,"height":90,"caption":"Ukraine crisis media center"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/uacrisis.org\/uk\/#logo"}},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/uacrisis.org\/uk\/#website","url":"https:\/\/uacrisis.org\/uk\/","name":"Uacrisis.org","description":"Ukraine crisis media center","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/uacrisis.org\/uk\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/uacrisis.org\/uk\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/uacrisis.org\/en\/9283-reply-john-mearsheimer-putin-realist#webpage","url":"https:\/\/uacrisis.org\/en\/9283-reply-john-mearsheimer-putin-realist","name":"A Reply to John Mearsheimer: Putin is Not a Realist | UACRISIS.ORG","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/uacrisis.org\/uk\/#website"},"datePublished":"2014-09-11T20:49:19+00:00","dateModified":"2014-09-12T10:00:30+00:00","description":"Since the beginning of crisis in Ukraine, a handful of high-profile American academics and former policy-makers -- including University of Chicago | Uacrisis.org","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/uacrisis.org\/en\/9283-reply-john-mearsheimer-putin-realist#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/uacrisis.org\/en\/9283-reply-john-mearsheimer-putin-realist"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/uacrisis.org\/en\/9283-reply-john-mearsheimer-putin-realist#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"\u0413\u043b\u0430\u0432\u043d\u0430\u044f \u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0446\u0430","item":"https:\/\/uacrisis.org\/en"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"A Reply to John Mearsheimer: Putin is Not a Realist"}]},{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/uacrisis.org\/en\/9283-reply-john-mearsheimer-putin-realist#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/uacrisis.org\/en\/9283-reply-john-mearsheimer-putin-realist#webpage"},"author":{"@id":"https:\/\/uacrisis.org\/uk\/#\/schema\/person\/31691010a01129c86dc9dc11eebe8df9"},"headline":"A Reply to John Mearsheimer: Putin is Not a Realist","datePublished":"2014-09-11T20:49:19+00:00","dateModified":"2014-09-12T10:00:30+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/uacrisis.org\/en\/9283-reply-john-mearsheimer-putin-realist#webpage"},"wordCount":1307,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/uacrisis.org\/uk\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Press release","Society"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/uacrisis.org\/en\/9283-reply-john-mearsheimer-putin-realist#respond"]}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/uacrisis.org\/uk\/#\/schema\/person\/31691010a01129c86dc9dc11eebe8df9","name":"\u0417\u0430\u0445\u0430\u0440 \u0411\u0443\u0442\u043a\u043e"}]}},"wps_subtitle":"","amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/uacrisis.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19195"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/uacrisis.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/uacrisis.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/uacrisis.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/20"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/uacrisis.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19195"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/uacrisis.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19195\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/uacrisis.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19195"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/uacrisis.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19195"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/uacrisis.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19195"},{"taxonomy":"section","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/uacrisis.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/section?post=19195"},{"taxonomy":"form","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/uacrisis.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/form?post=19195"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}